Will the results of the Q3 move the Cisco shares higher?

Note: Cisco’s Fy 2024 ended on July 27, 2024

Cisco Systems Inc (Nasdaq: CSCO)A company that offers networking devices, security, collaboration and cloud management services is to publish the result of the third quarter in the third quarter on Wednesday, May 14, 2025, and analysts predict income from 92 cents per share to $ 14.06 billion. This would increase the increase in adjusted profit compared to the previous year by 5% and a turnover of sales by 11%, compared to the figures of the previous year of 88 cents per share and sales of $ 12.7 billion. In the past, the CSCO share has shown a tendency to exaggerate according to the earnings files, which increased by 60% of cases with an average one-day of 4.2% and a maximum observed increase of 7%.

Cisco remains sensitive To global economically Shifts due To It is large institutional customer Base. While Tariff To Canada, China, And Mexico May Pressure Profitability, management has taken Steps To mitigate her Effects. Despite this Uncertainties, Cisco keep It is market guide And Is So-positioned To To use From the Internet of Things (IoT) Growth. The company has $ 238 of USD 238 in the current market capitalization. The turnover in the past twelve months was 54 Bil of $ 54, and with 12 bils of 12 bils was surgically profitable and net profit of $ 9.2.

For event -oriented dealers, historical patterns can offer an advantage, be it by positioning before income or reaction to movements after publication. However, if you look up with less volatility than from individual shares, the high -quality Treffis portfolio offers an alternative after you have exceeded the S&P 500 and have achieved returns of more than 91% since it was founded. See earnings reaction history of all shares.

Photo from zozz_ on Pixabay

Cisco’s historical probability of a positive return after the result after the preservation

Some observations on One-Day (1d) Nachmachen are returned:

• 20 yield data points have been recorded in the past five years 12 positive And 8 negative One -day (1d) returns observed. In summary, positive 1D returns were achieved in about 60% of cases.
• However, this percentage drops to 58%if we consider data instead of 5 in the past 3 years.
• Median of the 12 positive returns = 4.2%and median of the 8 negative returns = -4.1%

Additional data for observed 5 days (5d) and 21 days (21d) returns according to the result are summarized together with the statistics in the following table.

Correlation between 1d, 5d and 21d historical returns

A relatively less risky strategy (although not useful if the correlation is low) is to understand the correlation between short -term and medium -term returns according to the income, to find a couple with the highest correlation and to carry out the corresponding trade. For example, if 1D and 5D have the highest correlation, a dealer can position himself “long” for the next 5 days if 1D return is positive after maintenance. Here you will find some correlation data based on the 5-year and 3-year history (new) history. Note that the correlation 1D_5D relates to the correlation between the 1D after-return and subsequent 5D returns.

CSCO correlation between 1d, 5d and 21d historical returns

Is there a correlation with peer income?

Sometimes the peer performance can influence the stock reaction after the preservation. In fact, price-in could begin before the profits are announced. Here you will find some historical data on the past after the performance of Cisco Systems shares compared to the stock performance of colleagues who have reported the profits shortly before Cisco Systems. For a fair comparison, peer shares also represent the return of one-day returns (1d) after the purchase.

Find out more about the Treffis RV strategy that has exceeded his all-cap share benchmark (Combination of all 3, S&P 500, S&P Mid-Cap and Russell 2000) to achieve strong returns.

Invest with Treffis market fitting portfolios

See everyone Meeting Price estimates

The views and opinions expressed here are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect Nasdaq, Inc..